top of page

Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries through Sustainable and Advanced Processing Technologies

Haq I, Alam M and Ahsan N

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22235503

ABSTRACT

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are rapidly gaining acceptance in electric vehicles, energy storage systems and portable electronics, and have brought the need for sustainable end-of-life management to a new level. Again, there is significant recovery value for spent batteries: NMC and NCA cathodes contain 8-15% cobalt and nickel and 1.3-1.9% lithium by mass and LFP cells contain over 43% iron/steel with virtually no cobalt content; therefore, recycling operations need to be chemistry-specific. Hydrometallurgical leaching with 1–4 M inorganic acid (H₂SO₄, HCl, HNO₃) and H₂O₂ as a reductant is able to recover 95–100% of Li, Co, Ni and Mn under moderate conditions (70-95°C and 60-240 min), although pyrometallurgical (smelting) process works above 1000C and tolerates feedstock but losses a substantial amount of lithium and manganese to the slag phase. A number of organic acids (citric, oxalic, lactic and malic acid), which enable comparable Li recovery of 80–100% at 60–100°C, and Co recovery of 80–98%, can also reduce the toxicity of the reagents, but the emergence of deep eutectic solvents (DESs) allows for lower generation of by-products and reactions at even milder conditions (60–90°C), while also presenting challenges in solvent regeneration and selectivity. The use of acidophilic microorganisms like Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Aspergillus niger is an alternative technology for bioleaching, which can extract 85-95% of Li and Co at ambient conditions with a pH range of 1.2-3.5 and with slower processing time. Selective chemical precipitation is achieved in a controlled pH process, allowing for the ability to separate valuable metals from complex leachates in an economical and scalable fashion downstream. This review brings together the above process routes and compares their recovery efficiencies, consumptions of reagents/energy and scalability, and proposes a hybrid thermal-hydrometallurgical route as the most promising one to reach an economically viable, low carbon LIB recycling.

by.png

License: Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. Visit for more details http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

bottom of page