top of page
Windows 7 ultimate collection of wallpapers (60).jpg

Antibiogram And Microbial Carriage Of Campus Buses And Keke Napep Door Handles In Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Makurdi

Joel Inya Odo 1, Paulyn Tracy Aernan 2 and Rose Doowuese Toryila 2

2024/01/01

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10448219

ABSTRACT

As people come in contact with surfaces like keyboards, office furniture, toilet doors, buses and keke door handles, there is a probability of picking up microbes deposited on them. This study is aimed at evaluating the antibiogram and microbial carriage of campus buses and keke napep door handles. Thirty swab samples were obtained from buses and keke napep door handles. The samples were taken to the laboratory where they were serially diluted and inoculated. Identification, characterization and biochemical analysis were done using standard microbiological methods. Fungal colonies were macroscopically and microscopically examined for morphology and appearance. Bacterial isolated were identified to be Staphylococcus spp., Proteus spp., Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. Fungi isolated were identified to be Aspergillus niger, Mucor spp., Aspergillus fumigates, Rhizopus spp. and Yeast spp. This study has shown that for both bacterial and fungal species, Staphylococcus spp.5(33.33%) and Aspergillus niger 2(50%) had the highest occurrence while Proteus spp. 1(6.67%), Aspergillus fumigates and Mucor spp. 1(14.29%) had the least occurrence. Results of susceptibility test carried out on bacteria isolates show Staphylococcus spp. was most susceptible to levofloxacin having 21.67 ± 2.89 mean zone of inhibition and was resistant to rifampicin which had no zone of inhibition. Furthermore, using Gram-negative disc, all the isolates were susceptible to the antibiotics used except Proteus spp. which showed resistance to ciporex and nalidixic acid. Data was further analyzed at P<0.05 using ANOVA. The analysis shows that there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the susceptibility analysis. This study has shown that Campus Buses door handles have higher microbial carriage than keke door handles though both can serve as a means of microbial carriage and vehicle for the transmission of disease since they are associated with pathogenic organisms thus, hygienic measures should be taken to avoid the transmission of diseases by these public surfaces in which contact is constantly made with.

AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS

1 Departments of Fisheries and Aquaculture Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria
2 Department of Microbiology, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria

29111_edited.jpg

CITATION

Odo JI, Aernan PT and Toryila RD (2024) Antibiogram and Microbial Carriage of Campus Buses and Keke Napep Door Handles in Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Makurdi. Environ Sci Arch 3(1): 5-13.

REFERENCES

Amala SE and Ade AJ (2015) Bacteria associated with toilets and offices lock handles. International Journal of Epidemiology and Infection 3(1): 12-15.

Bashir SF, Muhammad H, Sani NM and Kawo AH (2016) Isolation and Identification of Bacterial Contaminants from Door Handles of Public Toilets in Federal University Dutse, Jigawa State- Nigeria, Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences 11(5): 53-57.

Bloomfield SF, Aiello AE, Cookson BO, Boyle C and Larson EL (2007) The effectiveness of hand hygiene procedures in reducing the risks of infections in home and community settings including hand washing and alcohol-based hand sanitizers. American Journal of Infection Control 35: 27-64.

Cheesbrough M (2009) District laboratory practice in tropical countries, Part 2.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 131-159.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2005) Performance for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Fifteenth Information Supplement 3(1): 100-515.

Courvalin P (2008) Predictable and unpredictable evolution of antibiotic resistance. J Intern Med. 264: 4-16.
El-Ghwas DE, Elkhateeb WA and Daba GM (2023) Fungi: The Next Generation of Biofertilizers. Environ Sci Arch 2(1): 34-41.

Fawole MO and Osho BA (2007) Laboratory Manual of Microbiology. Ibadan books Ltd.
Francesco Z (2010) Normal microbial flora. Clinical Microbiology Review 20:345-352.

Kluytmans J, Van Belkum A and Verbrugh H (1997) Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology underlying mechanisms associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev 10:505-550.

Kritu P, Prakash G, Shiba KR, et al. (2013) Antibiogram Typing of Gram negative isolates in different clinical samples of a tertiary care hospital. Asian J PharmClin Res 6(1): 153-156.

Miller LG and Diep BA (2008) Colonization, fomites and virulence: rethinking the pathogenesis of community associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis 46: 752-760.

Odo JI, Eneyi EE and Blessing O (2023) Isolation and Characterization of Bacterial Species from Selected Swimming Pools of Makurdi, Nigeria. Environ Sci Arch 2(2): 185-194.

Pinner RW, Teutsch SM, Simonsen L, et al. (1996) Trends in infectious diseases mortality in the United States, Journal of the American Medical Association 275(3): 189-193.

Reynolds KA and Hurst CJ (2005) Manual of Environmental Microbiology. 2nd Annual Public Health Association 1-9.

Rusin P, Maxwell S and Gerba C (2002) Comparative surface-to-hand and fingertip-to-mouth transfer efficiency of Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and phage. Journal of applied Microbiology 93:585-592.

Tagoe DN, Gyande V and Ansa EV (2011) Bacterial contamination of mobile phones: when your phone could transmit more than just a cell. Webmed Microbiology 2(10):2294-2296.

Tayal P, Mandal S, Pandey P and Verma NK (2023) Impact of Microplastic Pollution on Human Health. Environ Sci Arch 2(2): 195-204.

World Health Organization (2002) Department of Communicable Diseases, Surveillance and Responses.
Ahmed Z (2022) Various Applications of Eco-friendly Jute and as an Alternative of Environmentally Hazardous Plastic – A Review. Environ Sci Arch 1(2): 64-73.

Ahmed Z (2023) Bacterial Inocula Package Formulation and Application for Fibre Extraction from Bark of Dried Cultivated Varieties of Corchorus capsularis. Environ Sci Arch 2(2):156-163.

by.png

License: Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. Visit for more details http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

bottom of page